The Indictment of Anthony Fauci for His Big Lie

With a grand jury approach, the revealing of evidence herein shows that Dr. Anthony Fauci has deliberately ignored massive amounts of data showing that hydroxychloroquine is a safe, cheap and effective remedy for COVID-19. By ignoring his ethical responsibility as a physician to first do no harm, his behavior continues to cause preventable pain, suffering and death. Evidence also vindicates what President Trump said and did early on to inform Americans about the benefits of hydroxychloroquine.

1. The Case

Mounting COVID-19 cases and deaths result from limitations on physicians using a safe, effective and low-cost treatment medicine. This, despite many studies and data from other countries showing that HCQ really works to lower death rates and keep affected people from needing hospitalizations and expensive care.

Missing from discussions of hydroxychloroquine use is explicit acknowledgment that Anthony Fauci has used his considerable power and influence to block use of the drug and prevent physicians from using their best judgment. The media have failed to connect two death-causing actions: 1. Some state governors forcing nursing homes to accept virus-infected elderly people; and 2. Government preventing wide and early use of HCQ.

2. Reluctance to condemn Fauci

Nearly everyone seems afraid to openly condemn Fauci’s behavior and demand a reversal of his position on HCQ, which would also impact CDC and FDA.

He has made himself the king of virus medicine through constant media appearances far beyond what is normal for a medical researcher. He is part of is a research organization, not a public health or drug approval agency. As much a tyrant as a virus expert, Fauci has stubbornly refused to admit his mistake.

In this vein, an Australian government official has recently condemned the ban on using HCQ:

“Health bureaucrats have ‘violated the very first principle of the Hippocratic oath’ which is to ‘do no harm.’… and they must lift their bans. Otherwise they are engaged in crimes against humanity, and they should be taken to the criminal court in The Hague.”

Some Americans blame President Trump for the high levels of cases, hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19. But they have more reason to blame Fauci and his pandemic of lies about HCQ. At the end of this article is a “political” solution. It could make stockpiled HCQ broadly available.

3. The Evidence

As in a grand jury, this article cites many publications and detailed information demonstrating the proper and effective use of HCQ that has already saved millions of lives worldwide in this pandemic and could save millions more.

In sum, evidence shows that HCQ should be taken very early, either at home in the first few days after a positive test or after symptoms deemed significant by a physician, or in the first days of hospitalization. Also, evidence shows that HCQ should be taken along with zinc and an antibiotic, such as doxycycline. Such a “cocktail” can stop the virus at its earliest stage before the very severe second stage.

The Economic Standard’s new white paper argues that “HCQ has met the appropriate burden of proof and urges members of the U.S. news media, public health community, and regulatory agencies to stop politicizing the use of this medicine… opponents have deprived many tens of thousands of Americans of a potentially life-saving treatment.” But like other reports, the critical role of Fauci in blocking broad use of HCQ is missing.

A just released Italian study of 3,451 hospitalized patients found 30% less mortality, better than that reported for the very costly remdesivir in hospitals, touted by Fauci. An earlier, smaller Italian study found a 66% reduction in death in hospital patients. A Belgium study of 8,075 hospitalized patients found a 65% reduction. Likewise, a recent study from Saudi Arabia found 43% fewer hospitalizations and 45% fewer ICU admissions. For high-risk nursing home patients in Spain HCQ cut the risk of a bad outcome in half.

A large Henry Ford Hospital System study found a mortality rate for 2,541 patients of 13.5% for HCQ alone, 20.1% for HCQ plus azithromycin, and 26.4% for neither.

A new analysis by R. Clinton Ohlers is title, “Effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine was hiding in plain sight.” An early widely publicized study concluded that HCQ was not effective in New York patients. In truth: “Survival rates for hospitalized patients who received the drug approached 85%” and “with azithromycin the survival rate rose as high as 90%.” Without either drug, “survival fell to levels as low as 53%.” Conclusion: “a highly effective, inexpensive, and widely available treatment for COVID-19 is already in hand.”

Similarly, Dr. Watanabe from Brazil reanalyzed a Minnesota study that had a negative conclusion. For very early HCQ use, he found that “reduction in symptomatic outcomes is 72% after 0 days (first day of infection), 48.9% after 1 day and 29.3% after 2 days” – all compared to a placebo group. Conclusion: “Infected patients may have a large benefit if treated as early as possible.”

Cover Up: Fauci Approved Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine 15 Years Ago to Cure Coronaviruses; “Nobody Needed to Die”
Clearly, many media-hyped studies saying HCQ has no benefits are not credible. Some medical journal papers were retracted.

An article by physician Norman Doidge is “Hydroxychloroquine: A Morality Tale – A startling investigation into how a cheap, well-known drug became a political football in the midst of a pandemic.” Conclusion: “Worldwide [HCQ] might save a million or more people before COVID is tamed.” Some studies were poorly designed. In one case “the patients were given the medication late – on average 16.6 days after the first symptoms.”

Another important study is: “Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine: a country-based analysis.” Critical conclusion: The death rate from the virus in a number of nations where HCQ has been made widely available (the treatment group) is about 74% less than in those nations, including the U.S., where it has not been made available (the control group).

Many physicians and experts on viruses have published strong pro-HCQ articles, notably Dr. Harvey Risch from Yale University. He has repeatedly argued for using HCQ as the standard outpatient therapy. This article is for a general audience. In a medical journal article, he warned against “sitting by and letting hundreds of thousands die because we did not have the courage to act according to our rational calculations.”

Experienced pro-HCQ front-line doctors have appeared on Fox News shows, including Dr. Stephen Smith, Dr, Marc Siegel (whose 96-year-old father was saved with HCQ), Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, Dr. Mehmet Oz and Dr. Risch who noted, “We’re basically fighting a propaganda war against the medical facts” and that “75,000 to 100,000 lives will be saved” if the national HCQ stockpile were used. Fox’s Sean Hannity had Dr. George Fareed, an early user of HCQ, on a recent radio show.

A new CDC publication reveals prescriptions for HCQ at retail stores (not mail order). In March through June this year there likely were 680,000 prescriptions for treating the virus. After the government clamp down, prescriptions in May and June averaged 80,000 a month. This limited use may help explain many reduced death rates.

And despite negative actions by some governments and the World Health Organization, the Sermo survey of physicians in 30 countries found for this September that HCQ is being used for 22% of patients outside hospitals, 21% inside them and even 14% in ICUs.

4. Problems with Fauci’s Positions

Dr. Fauci is only satisfied with randomized control trials (RCTs). This position has been sharply debunked, as has the assertion of negative health effects and that HCQ risks outweigh its benefits.

Thomas R. Frieden, former head of the CDC, concluded in 2017: “Despite their strengths, RCTs have substantial limitations.” He supported using many other kinds of data that now constitute the evidence for using HCQ.

Similarly, Norman Doidge observed: “RCT is best understood as standing not for Randomized Control Trials, but rather ‘Rigidly Constrained Thinking.’ in the current COVID-19 situation… we cannot simply, as so many are insisting [namely Fauci], rely only on the long-awaited RCTs to decide how to treat COVID-19.”

Importantly, hundreds of drugs have been approved without RCTs, including hydrocortisone, Lasix, tetanus vaccine, insulin, tetracycline, warfarin, heparin, prednisone, half of chemotherapy drugs used in cancer and uses of HCQ for many diseases, such as malaria and lupus.

Another false criticism has recently been debunked: “HCQ decreases cardiac events. HCQ should not be restricted in COVID-19 patients out of fear of cardiac mortality.” Another study concluded: “HCQ administration is safe for a short-term treatment for patients with COVID-19… causing… no directly attributable arrhythmic deaths.” Dr. James Todaro concluded: “It is highly unlikely that fatal cardiac cases are from hydroxychloroquine use. It is far more likely that the disease itself is the cause of arrhythmias and cardiac injury during the hyperinflammation phase of severe cases of COVID-19.”

An article by Steven Hatfill, “Why Is The Media Suppressing Information About Hydroxychloroquine’s Effectiveness Against COVID?” noted, “There are now 53 studies that show positive results of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 infections.” It also highlights the early Fauci and FDA strategy that promoted use of HCQ for hospitalized patients (when it was mostly too late) rather than early outpatient use.

The Doidge article noted that for a major study that found a 66% reduction in hospital deaths from use of HCQ, Fauci “didn’t seem excited.” The key question: “Why should anyone facing a pandemic wish to discredit potentially lifesaving medications?” The answer: The billions of dollars to be made from selling medications and vaccines. Fauci has had a very close relationship with pharmaceutical companies and has patents for one of the leading vaccines being tested by Moderna.

In August three-front line physicians wrote a detailed open letter to Fauci making the medical case for unblocking widespread use of HCQ. “You are largely unchallenged in terms of your medical opinions. You are the de facto COVID-19 Czar… Americans must not continue to die unnecessarily. Adults must resume employment and our youth return to school. Locking down America while awaiting an imperfect vaccine has done far more damage to Americans than the coronavirus.”

An important article by an epidemiologist rebutted the explanation by Fauci of why he rejects the incredible amount of evidence supporting use of HCQ. Conclusion: “I earnestly hope that Dr. Fauci reconsiders his opposition to HCQ and restores his hitherto considerable reputation.”

Schachtel noted, “Mad scientist: Fauci demands total U.S. shutdown until COVID vaccine arrives: There is no basis for Fauci’s claim that he can manipulate society into stopping the virus. He is either a victim of the illusion of control, or he has embraced total deception as part of his power drunk campaign to stay in the spotlight.”

Dr. Lee D. Merritt unraveled the question of why Fauci has been so negative about HCQ: “Why is he so strongly promoting the $3,600 remdesiver and almost totally ignoring the $20 HCQ regimen, other than to say the latter is of ‘unproven benefit’?” Are there conflicts of interest? She noted that Fauci is an integral part of a vaccine coalition, specifically the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), a collaboration of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Fauci’s group. Fauci is also in the Leadership Council of the ‘Decade of Vaccines’ Council. Large sums of money flow from the Gates Foundation to and around Fauci’s projects.

5. Indictment justified

The continued use of crippling lockdowns advocated by Fauci is sheer lunacy when, in fact, we have an effective therapeutic. Early use of HCQ coupled with understanding the low impact of the virus on younger and healthy people would have blocked local and state lockdowns.

Waiting for large-scale use of a proven vaccine to justify restoring our society and economy is just plain stupid. If Fauci were a genuine public health official and not just a medical researcher, then he would have recognized the great many negative health impacts of lockdowns and waiting for a broadly used vaccine. He has not.

In sum: Every single day people are suffering and dying unnecessarily because Fauci refuses to accept HCQ facts. Instead, in endless media statements and appearances he pushes masks, lockdowns and vaccines.

Anthony Fauci benefits from incorrect views of HCQ in the mostly leftist press. From The Washington Post: “There is no solid scientific evidence hydroxychloroquine should be used to treat COVID-19.” Similarly, Twitter recently issued a warning “about the potential risks” of HCQ use. USA Today claimed science “has shown [HCQ] does not have a clinical benefit for COVID-19 patients and even has increased risks.”

6. Indictment specifics

For this grand jury proceeding, substantial evidence supports the indictment of Fauci on these counts:

A. Violating his physician oath to first do no harm.

B. Using his substantial influence to block widespread use of the proven safe, cheap and effective HCQ and, consequently, causing preventable pain, suffering and death for many thousands of Americans directly and through crippling lockdowns with their own negative health impacts.

C. Blocking traditional medical freedom and preventing physicians from using their best judgment in selecting for their patients the best treatment for COVID-19.

7. Solution

As a form of trial for the indicted Fauci, here is a practical way to defeat anti-HCQ efforts and the leftist, anti-Trump media and, more importantly, help Americans.

Immediately create a special work group under the White House Pandemic Task Force. Have it co-chaired by Dr. Scott Atlas, now a member of the Task Force, and the eminent Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale University. Have them select 10 additional members. Mandate them to deliver to the Task Force and President Trump within 30 days a recommendation to remove government restrictions on the use of HCQ or maintain the status quo. Let truth prevail.

None of These Diseases

“If you will listen carefully to the voice of the LORD your God and do what is right in his sight, obeying his commands and laws, then I will not make you suffer the diseases I sent on the Egyptians; for I am the LORD who heals you.” Exodus 15:26

The whole world is in total chaos. Schools, government institutions, cities, businesses, etc, are being shut down in many countries. This is absolutely one of the world’s worst pandemics. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caught everybody napping. As at today (March 20) we have more than 302,000 reported cases worldwide and 12, 955 deaths. Italy is the worst hit with about 5,000 deaths. It just had 793 fatalities in the last 24 hours. We don’t want to go into the when and where the virus originated from, but there is hope for the control of its spread. The United States government has made some prescriptions of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as treatments for the virus, though the experts are still looking into it. Then the Oxford University team of researchers led by Professor Sarah Gilbert is also working on a vaccine that is due for trails from next week. Yet, precaution and isolation remain very helpful to battle this disease.

Now, for me the most important thing now and after this time is to have a spiritual coverage that can exempt you from such plagues. When you are connected divinely, no disease, no accident or mishap is permitted to kill you before fulfilling your destiny. I mean there is a divine purpose that brought you into this world and if you are alive to it, God will not permit, allow anything to take you away prematurely. And I hope you know that I am not just talking about going to church and saying nice prayers here, but permanent, constantly, daily working for the advancement of the kingdom of God, completely living for him and exercising the consciousness of the divine covenants and promises in his word. It is not just enough to know that it is written in his word, but you must have to appropriate it in your life and situation.

Since the outbreak of this pandemic, I have had a strong feeling in me that I and those around me will not contact or die by this disease. Look at our main text at the beginning, God said that he will not inflict you with the diseases of the Egyptians and that he is your healer. It is a very strong promise that can melt any kind of disease, sickness or virus. Yes, God can keep you from contacting this virus and even if you already have, he will heal you. He is the healer. I like the doctors because they will always tell you that the treat you, but God remains the healer. He is the author, the giver and keeper of life. Nobody, nothing can die or live without his consent. Even a bird cannot drop from the sky without his knowledge. I wish you will get my audiobooks / books: I Shall Not Die and Never Again! You can Google them now. Yes, you can refuse to die.

I also remember the plagues in Egypt. The bible said that throughout the divine punishment, Goshen where the Israelites lived was exempted from the plagues. That is, the diseases, deaths, etc, were killing only the Egyptians and did not affect the children of God, though they lived in the same country. Today, I decree that none of these viruses, diseases and plagues shall touch you and your loved ones in Jesus’ name! Look at the last plague on the Passover night – the death of the first born of every man and beast in Egypt, Israelites were also exempted. It was recorded that “Pharaoh and all his officials and all the people of Egypt woke up during the night, and loud wailing was heard throughout the land of Egypt. There was not a single house where someone had not died.” Exodus 12:30. But not even a bark of a dog was heard among the Israelites! Everything was peaceful. We will hear and read about these things, but they shall not touch us because God is with us and we are operating under his covenant. See you on post Coronavirus.

Effective Drugs Not Priced For The Low Income Consumer

There have been many new biological drugs approved by the FDA to treat psoriasis since 2003 as one example of an inflated drug price that most lower income people can’t get access to because Medicaid and Medicare won’t pay for them due to the skyrocketing prices. The new blood thinner “Eliquis” is paid for by Medicaid and Medicare at $200 a bottle. The COPD inhalers which are fairly new are also paid for by the government without hesitation in the area of $150 a pop. Some states pay for the very expensive $400 and above hearing aids and some don’t. So why aren’t the new biological drugs that came out to treat psoriasis since 2003 paid for by the government?

I guess this is one moment where I’m going to answer the question I just asked of this articles readers. In the above linked article I posted to go with this article the author states these biological drugs to treat psoriasis will NOT be available to people who are on Medicaid and Medicare because of price. All the drug companies who have created their own biological psoriasis treatments have pushed people on Medicaid and Medicare away from receiving treatment with these drugs through the high cost of the drugs. Medicare Part D prescription drug plan will pay the bulk cost of “biological’s” but the co pay is between $1200 and $5000 which still keeps people from getting the biological’s.

The spin is a few of these biological drug companies have programs to supply the drugs free to low income patients who have private insurance only. Drug companies have stated in many articles I’ve read that if the patients have Medicare or Medicaid they will NOT be eligible for the free programs.

Quote From GoodRX.com: The lowest GoodRx price for the most common version of Humira is around $5,130.76, 38% off the average retail price of $8,309.04.

These biological psoriasis treatments are not life saving so Medicare and Medicaid do not recognize the inflated cost by drug companies as a necessary expense. The drug companies know this and want it this way. Back in 2003 when these biological psoriasis treatments were entering the drug marketplace they were affordable and insurance companies picked up the costs if a reasonable deductible was paid. After 2012 the insurance companies started to remove people with psoriasis because the payouts on the biological treatments were going up and getting extremely expensive.

The “Epipen Injector” used to treat heroin overdoses was attacked viciously by the U.S. government when the owner of the company jacked up the price so high only the really wealthy could afford them. Medicaid and Medicare in some states do cover generic Epipen’s but reject brand names. I’ve come to my conclusion about why this and other high drug prices are happening that keep some of these drugs out of the reach of many people who are on Medicare and Medicaid.

Come ON! of course it’s collusion between the “Big Pharma” drug industry and members of congress. But when the collusion deals go bad it’s the drug industry that is forced to take the fall.

When these scams to gain personal wealth come to light as in the opioid epidemic that is ongoing now where billions of dollars are being paid out by the drug companies to the states our congressional representatives who profited off of opioids though insider trading investments walk around with no chance of repercussion for their involvement in the scheme.

If you look at Canada which is a country where government has to pay for ALL healthcare costs you will see the lowest prices on quality drugs anywhere because the government forces prices down to lower government expenditures. All the drug companies that put together high profit drug plans to fill their pockets are destroyed without question by the Canadian government. In the U.S. our congressional representatives steer thought away from destroying excessive profit taking by the drug companies because they are invested in these drug companies for their own personal profit. Congressional Representatives enter congress with meager wealth and leave with excessive riches.

I just bet ya if a person gained access to the investments of our congressional leaders they would find many instances of drug company investments who have extremely high drug prices on popular needed drugs that really work to improve a persons health. Congress voted to give drug companies a 20 year patent before generics could be produced with a 5 year extension if certain conditions are met knowing that high drug prices would develop giving congressional insiders great profit making investment opportunities.

I hear now and again on news shows the patent time is now 12 years but I haven’t seen this 12 year patent time frame in “Wikipedia” or anywhere else. All I see are 20 year patent time frames. I searched around and found out after the drug is invented and a patent applied it may take around 8 years to get FDA approved which leaves 12 years for the drugs to remain on a patent.

Which of our congressional representatives would vote against this time honored tradition of screwing U.S. Citizens in the behind by increasing patent times so they could increase their own personal cash value through outrageous drug prices?

So lets take the biological psoriasis drugs as an example since they have only been around since 2003 or so. “Humira” was the first biological patent approved by the FDA for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Later on “Humira” was approved for the treatments of various other medical conditions including psoriasis.

If there is a 20 year patent on these drugs then “Humira” will be priced out of reach of the general public until 2023 which was a huge profit taking window for congressional representatives. “Skyrizi” which is new this year in 2019 is priced around “$15,000” for a one year kit which is 5 or 6 shots. “Humira” is injection and pill form. “Skyrizi” gets rid of 90% of psoriasis with the first two shots which are 4 weeks apart. “Skyrizi” will stay priced very high until about 2039 if it has a 20 year patent.

When Humira comes off of patent in 2023 it will send the manufacturing of it to the generic drug companies and drop the price to market value which may mean everyone on Medicaid and Medicare might have a chance to be treated with it. All biological drug manufacturers will be forced to drop their prices also to a reasonable level because ALL doctors will direct their patents to Humira leaving other drug companies with a product that cannot be sold because of price. In “India” a generic form of “Humira” is being manufactured and the monthly cost is only $400 which is only down a few hundred from the discounted prices in the U.S.. After “Humira” goes off patent in the U.S. even the generic “India” brand will fall in price even further.

I read it may cost a drug company over a billion dollars to develop a drug but this is “Bull Hicky”. For one think a drug company isn’t a drug company without a team of researchers. In fact a drug company is nothing but researchers. A drug company after it starts making a profit from the drugs they produced in the first place has to budget for a permanent research team to create future drug profits. The research team gets its paychecks from previous released drug sales always and forever and NO recouping of costs for the development of a new drug is ever needed. A drug company is just a huge laboratory full of scientists that get paid regularly to create new drugs and do constant experiments. No extra financial outputs are going on to drive drug prices through the roof.

Popular new releases of drugs are just total profit magnets for drug companies and congressional representatives. It’s like the town or city you live in making you believe that the cost to deal with an issue will exceed the taxes already collected to pay for the staff and resources to deal with the issues that are already funded.

The “Stock Act” was enacted on April 4th, 2012 which required every member of congress to post their investment transactions on their websites within 45 days of making them for public viewing. Congressional representatives do not want their investments looked at but when public demand dictated that it become law to have their investments made public they had to give into the public demand and folded to it. After a year congress went against public demand on April 15th 2013 and voted to kill the parts of the law that would make their investments public. Congress could not fulfill themselves at the expense of U.S. Citizens with riches galore through insider trading which they think they have a right to do since there’s no legal entity that will punish them.

As Effective Drug Markets Grow Any Drugs Under Patents Sore In Price To The Point Only The Wealthy Can Afford Them. In 2012 The Drug Companies Decided Psoriasis Biological’s Were A Profit Maker In A Fast Growing Market. The Move Was Made To Raise The Prices So Extreme Profits Could Be Realized Through There Patent Monopoly Scheme Of Marketing To The Rich

Biological psoriasis drugs were priced low in 2012 and insurance companies paid for them if an affordable deductible was paid by someone who had a good job. After the market for biological,s started to grow the market became hijacked by the wealthy as a way to increase their personal values by increasing the prices and marketing these drugs to the wealthy and themselves who are the wealthy for massive profit taking. People who were getting their psoriasis drugs paid for through their insurance companies were being dropped off their insurance plans. Even though insurance carriers paid for biological’s before 2012 low income Medicaid and Medicare patients still did not have access to these drugs. Medicare Part D prescription plan pays the bulk of cost but the copay is $1200 to $5000 dollars which means most Medicare patients do not have access to biological’s.

There’s no other way you can look at it. “Epipen’s” were getting the same treatment, they were introduced at a lowered price then hijacked for sale only to the wealthy which would produce high profits with decreased production costs. I keep running into the hearing aid issues that were suppose to have been priced into the thousands of dollars then being reduced to under $700 which is still to expensive and an arena of massive profit taking. High tech computer parts are cheaper than hearing aids?

With these drug companies as is with any business who holds a monopoly on any needed or popular product through government mandate the higher prices only the wealthy can pay are dictated which means less production will be needed that translates into lower production costs and the same or higher profit levels are kept. Production at market demand means higher manufacturing costs with lower profit margins.

If a business can market its products to only the wealthy and increase their profit margins from savings on decreased manufacturing costs they will do this. This is basically what’s happening with drugs in the U.S. that are on patents and congressional representatives are full participants in this kind of profit taking. Our congressional representatives are, “Milking It!” and creating higher drug prices.